18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
4
18
4
6
5
1
Best position
#5
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
#1
Average position
5.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
111
47
40
146
63
66

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison