Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

1

10

4

5

Best position

#5

#2

#3

#1

Average position

5.0

6.0

12.0

2.8

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

—

109

111

139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

98%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

95%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison