18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
10
4
3
4
1
Best position
#5
#2
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
5.0
6.0
12.0
3.7
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
109
111
36
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store