18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
11
18
4
1
4
Best position
#5
#1
#1
#3
#1
#2
Average position
5.0
11.6
6.1
12.0
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2024
2024
2024
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
122
47
111
66
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store