Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

Ventus Evo

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

5

10

3

Best position

#5

#1

#2

Average position

5.0

2.8

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

139

109

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

98%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

100%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV

Ventus Evo

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison