18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
4
1
18
6
28
Best position
#5
#2
#1
#1
#3
#1
Average position
5.0
3.3
1.0
6.1
4.7
2.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
40
27
47
146
67

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison