18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
1
4
4
6
1
Best position
#5
#7
#3
#2
#3
#1
Average position
5.0
7.0
12.0
3.3
4.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
88
111
40
146
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
90%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
77%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
70%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
98%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
100%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
95%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance 2 SUV
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store