18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
10
4
5
Best position
#10
#2
#3
#1
Average position
10.0
6.0
12.0
2.8
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
42
109
111
139

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison