Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Compact

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

10

14

5

3

Best position

#10

#2

#8

#1

#2

Average position

10.0

6.0

13.4

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

42

109

153

63

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs Pirelli P1 Cinturato Verde

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs Continental Ecocontact 6

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs Michelin Energy Saver+

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Compact

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison