18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
5
10
1
Best position
#10
#1
#2
#1
Average position
10.0
2.8
6.0
1.0
Latest test
2018
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
42
139
109
66

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison