18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Hankook
ION Evo
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
1
5
15
Best position
#10
#1
#1
#2
Average position
10.0
1.0
2.8
9.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
42
66
139
226

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison