18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
3
5
15
1
Best position
#10
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
10.0
3.7
2.8
9.0
1.0
Latest test
2018
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
42
36
139
226
66

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
39%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison