18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Continental
UltraContact
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
1
5
3
Best position
#10
#7
#1
#2
Average position
10.0
7.0
2.8
3.7
Latest test
2018
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
42
88
139
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store