18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Continental
UltraContact
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
1
1
1
6
Best position
#10
#7
#1
#3
Average position
10.0
7.0
1.0
4.7
Latest test
2018
2023
2025
2026
Available sizes
42
88
66
146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store