18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficientgrip Compact
Continental
UltraContact
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
1
6
3
Best position
#10
#7
#3
#2
Average position
10.0
7.0
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2018
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
42
88
146
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
65%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
34%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
81%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Costs
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
64%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
43%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry
Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact
86%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store