Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Goodyear

Efficientgrip Compact

R13 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Efficientgrip Compact

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

14

10

4

3

Best position

#10

#8

#2

#3

#2

Average position

10.0

13.4

6.0

12.0

3.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

42

153

109

111

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

39%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

34%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

64%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

43%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Costs

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs Pirelli P1 Cinturato Verde

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs Continental Ecocontact 6

Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs Michelin Energy Saver+

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficientgrip Compact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Compact

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison