18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Nokian
Line SUV
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
16
5
4
1
4
3
Best position
#3
#2
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
5.5
4.2
12.0
1.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2023
2017
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
33
111
66
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Nokian Line SUV
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Nokian Line SUV
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Nokian Line SUV
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Nokian Line SUV
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Nokian Line SUV
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Nokian Line SUV
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry driving behavior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Nokian Line SUV
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Nokian Line SUV
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Nokian Line SUV
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Nokian Line SUV
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Nokian Line SUV
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Nokian Line SUV
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store