18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P Zero (PZ5) vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Pirelli
P Zero (PZ5)
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
16
4
3
6
4
28
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
12.0
3.0
4.7
3.3
2.3
Latest test
2023
2025
2026
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
153
111
17
146
40
67

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Pirelli P Zero (PZ5)
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison