18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
16
4
3
28
1
4
Best position
#3
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
5.5
12.0
3.7
2.3
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
111
36
67
66
40

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Tyres for EV carsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMMichelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFalken e.Ziex vs Maxxis Premitra AS AP3

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison