18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
16
2
18
5
3
4
Best position
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
5.5
1.5
6.1
2.8
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2023
2024
2024
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
54
47
139
36
40

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison