18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
CrossClimate 2 SUV
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
16
2
14
4
5
Best position
#3
#1
#8
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
1.5
13.4
3.3
2.8
Latest test
2023
2024
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
153
54
153
40
139

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry driving behavior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison