Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 S

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Number of tests

16

18

3

10

4

1

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

5.5

6.1

3.7

2.1

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2023

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

153

47

36

195

40

66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry lane changing

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContact

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponse

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 S

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison