18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
16
3
4
5
17
Best position
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
5.5
3.7
3.3
2.2
1.7
Latest test
2023
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
153
36
40
63
80

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Dry driving behavior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison