18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
16
3
14
1
4
3
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
5.5
3.7
3.6
1.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
36
194
66
40
36

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison