18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
18
4
13
17
1
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
12.0
4.3
1.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
111
123
80
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Indicative only
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Indicative only
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Michelin Primacy 4+
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Comfort
Indicative only
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Costs
Indicative only
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Michelin Primacy 4+
51%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store