18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
18
4
10
4
5
1
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
6.1
12.0
6.0
3.3
2.2
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
111
109
40
63
66
36

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison