18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
18
4
5
4
3
1
5
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
12.0
2.8
3.3
3.7
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
111
139
40
36
66
63

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison