18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Hankook
ION Evo
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
18
4
17
1
14
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
6.1
12.0
1.7
1.0
5.5
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
111
80
66
700

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Dry
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%
Comfort
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Costs
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
28%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store