18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
18
10
23
28
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
6.0
6.7
2.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
47
109
107
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Comfort
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Costs
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store