18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
18
10
14
4
5
Best position
#1
#2
#8
#3
#1
Average position
6.1
6.0
13.4
12.0
2.8
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
47
109
153
111
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store