Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

18

11

10

4

3

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#2

Average position

6.1

11.6

6.0

12.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

47

122

109

111

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Dynaxer HP4

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Tread pattern comparison

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison