Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

18

1

10

4

5

4

3

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#1

#2

Average position

6.1

1.0

6.0

12.0

2.2

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

47

27

109

111

63

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison