Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

Roadhawk

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

18

1

21

13

4

3

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

6.1

1.0

11.9

4.3

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2024

2025

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

47

27

165

123

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin Primacy 4+

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Michelin Primacy 4+

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Michelin Primacy 4+

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Michelin Primacy 4+

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Michelin Primacy 4+

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

51%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

Roadhawk

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison