Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

18

1

21

4

3

5

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

1.0

11.9

3.3

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2024

2025

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

47

27

165

40

36

63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Wet side guide

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Interior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Price/value

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison