18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
18
4
49
1
28
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
3.3
3.2
1.0
2.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
47
40
213
66
67

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison