18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

You've hit your limit · resets 5am (Europe/Berlin)

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
18
16
1
10
6
3
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#3
#2
Average position
6.1
5.5
1.0
6.0
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2024
2023
2025
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
47
153
27
109
146
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dry
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comfort
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store