18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

When we compare the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 with the Firestone Roadhawk, we can see striking differences in performance and features. Both tyres are designed for summer use but show varying test results.


The Goodyear tyre is rated robustly by our team with a score of 87%. It comes with an exceptional record in mileage and value for money and is lauded for the comfort it offers. In comparison tests, its ranking stood 13th out of 53 in the Autobild test. This model is a direct replacement of the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance.
In a review by Autobild 2022, the Goodyear tyre received praise for its premium profile, efficient handling, short braking distance, and top scores in cost evaluations. Yet, it also got marked down for its high price level.


The Firestone Roadhawk, on the other hand, received an overall rating of 72% by our team. It stood out for its dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guide in its 10th position in the Autobild test (out of a total of 53 tyres tested). However, it showed weaknesses on wet roads which lead to a decrease in its overall score in the ACE 2020's test. In the ADAC and ADAC 2022 tests, it distinguished itself in dry braking and wet circle cornering, yet it was criticized for poor wet handling, loud noise, and durability issues (9th position out of 16).


Though the two tyres have their unique pros and cons, looking at the test data the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 seems to have the edge overall. It outperforms the Firestone Roadhawk in our rating, comfort, mileage, as well as its cost-feature index. So, while the Firestone Roadhawk might be the better choice in terms of dry and wet handling, Goodyear's tyre seems to be the all-rounder giving you more bang for your buck. Remember to consider what factors – be it comfort, cost-effectiveness, or handling – are more important for your driving needs.


Explore more about these tyres and their manufacturers, Goodyear and Firestone on our website.

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
18
21
4
26
5
3
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
6.1
11.9
12.0
2.2
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2024
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
164
111
66
63
34

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison