18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

When we compare the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 with the Firestone Roadhawk, we can see striking differences in performance and features. Both tyres are designed for summer use but show varying test results.


The Goodyear tyre is rated robustly by our team with a score of 87%. It comes with an exceptional record in mileage and value for money and is lauded for the comfort it offers. In comparison tests, its ranking stood 13th out of 53 in the Autobild test. This model is a direct replacement of the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance.
In a review by Autobild 2022, the Goodyear tyre received praise for its premium profile, efficient handling, short braking distance, and top scores in cost evaluations. Yet, it also got marked down for its high price level.


The Firestone Roadhawk, on the other hand, received an overall rating of 72% by our team. It stood out for its dry handling, wet handling, and wet side guide in its 10th position in the Autobild test (out of a total of 53 tyres tested). However, it showed weaknesses on wet roads which lead to a decrease in its overall score in the ACE 2020's test. In the ADAC and ADAC 2022 tests, it distinguished itself in dry braking and wet circle cornering, yet it was criticized for poor wet handling, loud noise, and durability issues (9th position out of 16).


Though the two tyres have their unique pros and cons, looking at the test data the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 seems to have the edge overall. It outperforms the Firestone Roadhawk in our rating, comfort, mileage, as well as its cost-feature index. So, while the Firestone Roadhawk might be the better choice in terms of dry and wet handling, Goodyear's tyre seems to be the all-rounder giving you more bang for your buck. Remember to consider what factors – be it comfort, cost-effectiveness, or handling – are more important for your driving needs.


Explore more about these tyres and their manufacturers, Goodyear and Firestone on our website.

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
18
21
3
3
3
1
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
6.1
11.9
3.3
4.7
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
164
40
126
34
64

Wet

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Interior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%

Costs

Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison