Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

18

21

3

1

4

3

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

11.9

3.7

1.0

3.3

1.3

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

47

165

36

66

40

23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Wet side guide

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

Confidence

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Comfort

Confidence

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

90%

Costs

Confidence

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Price/value

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison