18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
18
3
5
4
5
3
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
6.1
3.7
2.2
3.3
4.8
1.3
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
47
36
63
40
158
23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store