Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraContact

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

18

1

4

3

6

Best position

#1

#7

#3

#2

#1

#3

Average position

6.1

7.0

12.0

3.3

1.3

4.7

Latest test

2024

2023

2025

2026

Available sizes

47

88

111

40

23

146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact

58%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Dry

Confidence

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Continental UltraContact

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Dry lane changing

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

Comfort

Confidence

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Costs

Confidence

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Continental UltraContact

Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Continental UltraContact vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Continental UltraContact vs Firestone Roadhawk

Continental UltraContact vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Continental UltraContact vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraContact

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Tread pattern comparison

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison