Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraContact

Ventus Prime 4

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

18

1

14

4

3

Best position

#1

#7

#2

#3

#2

Average position

6.1

7.0

6.3

12.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2024

2023

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

47

88

532

111

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact

58%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact

85%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact

71%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Continental UltraContact

91%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact

91%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry lane changing

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact

88%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact

88%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Continental UltraContact

Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Continental UltraContact vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Continental UltraContact vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Continental UltraContact vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Continental UltraContact vs Firestone Roadhawk

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Efficient Grip Performance 2

UltraContact

Ventus Prime 4

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Tread pattern comparison

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison