18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
18
1
5
1
3
4
Best position
#1
#7
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.1
7.0
2.2
1.0
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2024
2023
2025
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
47
88
63
66
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dry
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Costs
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store