18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
18
14
10
4
3
1
Best position
#1
#8
#2
#3
#2
#1
Average position
6.1
13.4
6.0
12.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
47
153
109
111
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Comfort
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Costs
Confidence
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store