Segment
2. Goodride SW608 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Goodride (6%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has a better rating of 93% compared to 6% of the Goodride SW608. The first tyre test of Goodride SW608 was done in 2018, compared to 2021 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the SW608 and the WinterContact TS 870 P were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Goodride SW608
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Goodride SW608 Lowcost
2. Goodride SW608 31.5
1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner
1. Goodride SW608 -32%
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 Rating: Poor | 2.8 | ||||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Good | 2.2 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodride SW608 Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Goodride SW608 | 40 | ||||||
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||