18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodride Sport SA-37 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Goodride
Sport SA-37
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
2
3
18
Best position
#18
#1
#1
Average position
20.0
1.3
6.1
Latest test
2020
2026
2024
Available sizes
23
47

Wet

Wet
Goodride Sport SA-37
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodride Sport SA-37
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Wet braking
Goodride Sport SA-37
48%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Goodride Sport SA-37
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodride Sport SA-37
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%

Dry

Dry
Goodride Sport SA-37
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Dry braking
Goodride Sport SA-37
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Dry handling
Goodride Sport SA-37
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Goodride Sport SA-37
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Exterior noise
Goodride Sport SA-37
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Comfort
Goodride Sport SA-37
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Goodride Sport SA-37
24%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Goodride Sport SA-37
24%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison