Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Upper-middle2. Goodride Solmax 1 Lowcost
Comparison: Goodride Solmax 1 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Yokohama summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Goodride (39%). In this particular case, the Yokohama BluEarth-XT has a better rating of 55% compared to 39% of the Goodride Solmax 1. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R18 test, where both the Solmax 1 and the BluEarth-XT were tested.
| # | Goodride Solmax 1
| Yokohama BluEarth-XT
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Satisfactory2. Goodride Solmax 1 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth-XT Satisfactory2. Goodride Solmax 1 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Goodride Solmax 1 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3- | 3+ | 3+ | ||||
| Yokohama BluEarth-XT Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
