Comparison: Goodride SA37 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Goodride

SA37

R15 – R22

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

SA37

Ecsta HS52

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

10

1

4

3

Best position

#9

#2

#1

#2

Average position

9.0

6.0

1.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

78

109

66

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Goodride SA37

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodride SA37

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Goodride SA37

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodride SA37

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Goodride SA37

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dry

Confidence

Goodride SA37

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Goodride SA37

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Goodride SA37

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Confidence

Goodride SA37

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Goodride SA37

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Confidence

Goodride SA37

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Goodride SA37

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Goodride SA37 vs Westlake Sport SA-37

Goodride SA37 vs Avon ZV7

Goodride SA37 vs Continental SportContact 7

Goodride SA37 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: Goodride SA37 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

SA37

Ecsta HS52

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison