Comparison: Goodride SA37 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Goodride

SA37

R15 – R22

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

SA37

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

P ZERO PZ4

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

1

10

4

14

5

Best position

#9

#2

#1

Average position

9.0

6.0

3.3

5.5

2.8

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

78

109

40

700

139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Goodride SA37

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Wet braking

Goodride SA37

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Goodride SA37

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Wet handling

Goodride SA37

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Goodride SA37

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Dry

Confidence

Goodride SA37

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Dry braking

Goodride SA37

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Dry handling

Goodride SA37

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Comfort

Confidence

Goodride SA37

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Exterior noise

Goodride SA37

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Costs

Confidence

Goodride SA37

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Rolling resistance

Goodride SA37

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Goodride SA37 vs Westlake Sport SA-37

Goodride SA37 vs Avon ZV7

Goodride SA37 vs Continental SportContact 7

Goodride SA37 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: Goodride SA37 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

SA37

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

P ZERO PZ4

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison