18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Goodride SA37 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6

Test Profile

Goodride
SA37
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Number of tests
1
10
15
Best position
#9
#2
#2
Average position
9.0
6.0
6.1
Latest test
2022
2026
2026
Available sizes
78
109
229

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Goodride SA37
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Aquaplaning - cross
Goodride SA37
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
76%
Wet braking
Goodride SA37
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Goodride SA37
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Wet handling
Goodride SA37
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
81%
Dry
Goodride SA37
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
78%
Dry braking
Goodride SA37
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Dry handling
Goodride SA37
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Comfort
Goodride SA37
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%
Exterior noise
Goodride SA37
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Costs
Goodride SA37
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
83%
Rolling resistance
Goodride SA37
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store